A Call to Relevance
Young Atticus
Exclusive to the St. Louis American and
www.cleanandarticulate.com
Last week I watched the opening of the 98th annual NAACP Conference in Detroit, as our most venerable organization continued to prove itself a farcical shell of its former self.In front of a huge crowd, the brass of the NAACP staged a funeral - casket, eulogy, dirges and all - for the N-word. The organization conducted the ceremony in an attempt to lay to rest what the Rev. Otis Moss Jr. called “the greatest child that racism ever birthed.” Amid cheers and cliché-filled speeches by the important and the self-important, participants dug a hole and laid a tombstone for the N-Word.Wow.
A few years ago when I joined my local African-American bar association, I wondered aloud if such organizations were still relevant. The question of relevance is not to be confused with necessity; I continue to believe that specific affinity and support groups are abundantly necessary in a variety of aspects of American life, where minorities remain underrepresented and unprotected, even exploited.But an honest and critical critique of our most recognizable organizations must lead one to wonder if our institutions are still relevant. Does anyone care what the groups have to say anymore? Does anyone care what they do? And if, as I fear, these questions are properly answered in the negative, then why are they no longer relevant and in turn respected, and most importantly, no longer effective in reaching their stated objectives?
To be blunt, on a national and local level the NAACP's leadership is old, and consequently, its methods are antiquated. It is outfitted with Civil Rights Movement leadership for a post-civil rights America. This is the only way to explain the total lack of substance we saw at this year's opening ceremony. What does a funeral for the N-word prove? What did it accomplish?Realistically, the cause of purely race-based civil rights in the African-American context has progressed as far as the law can take us. Save for reparations, there is very little room for argument that pervasive and ongoing discrimination exists that is per se discriminatory toward African Americans. This has stripped some purpose from one of the NAACP’s most prolific and effective departments, the Legal Defense Fund. Nevertheless, the organization as a whole has failed to develop current means of evolving and addressing current, more subtle ills, such as the digital divide, environmental racism and predatory lending.
It's not just the NAACP. Our local vanguards are irrelevant as well. I can be as black, as proud, and as militant as they come in my personal deliberations; but I can no longer subscribe to the local modules of thought and organizations that have my people shouting "no justice, no peace" when there has been neither an injustice, nor a reason for thoughtless breach of peace. I can't stand with a people who use the word "cracker" and deride Jews with impunity simply because their ethnicity provides a presumption of enemyhood.
If the methods of the movement are outdated, then what is potentially effective? Negotiation. Cooperation. Well researched and well prepared litigation where necessary. Properly timed and expertly placed advocacy. Building friendships across the proverbial aisle, rather than alienating the ostensibly different before any true examination takes place, is paramount.
Similarly, if worn out methods have rendered our institutions irrelevant and ineffective, who or what remains relevant and effective?Donna Brazille is relevant because she thinks and evaluates before she advises and acts. Matthews Dickey Boys and Girls Club of St. Louis is relevant because it has consistently sought aid and friends from all over the demographic spectrum. Jim Clingman and the Black Million Dollar Club are relevant because they recruited thousands of donors nationwide via e mail to give $5 every month to a different chosen charity. The elder on the street who pulls a young buck to the side and talks with him instead of preaching at him is relevant.
We can no longer afford to cede our most vaunted institutions to the same leaders, the same methods, and the same ideas that we have employed for the last 60 years. To do so will inevitably result in the continued stranglehold of the faceless demagogues who can shout the loudest and rhyme the best, and the continued tragic spiral of our once brightest organizational hopes toward irrelevance and eventual obscurity. Visionary leaders and motivated servants must step forward to take the reins. If not, then the next funeral will not be symbolic, but an actual homegoing for the NAACP itself.