Selfish Post
Based on the pleadings alone, a defendant can move to dismiss a plaintiff’s claim based on the plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This motion is based on FRCP 12b6. The essence of this motion is that the plaintiff has not stated a claim that is actionable by law; or there is no legal recourse for the defendant’s actions.
This is different from a motion for summary judgment, from FRCP 56. A motion for summary judgment still happens upon the pleadings, before the introduction of evidence. A motion for summary judgment says that there is no genuine issue of triable fact: that if all the facts are to be construed in favor of the nonmoving party, the nonmoving party cannot prevail, and therefore, judgment should be given for the moving party as a matter of law. There are two types of summary judgment motion, offensive and defensive. An offensive SJ motion is when a plaintiff moves that a defendant cannot win the lawsuit, even if all facts are construed in the light most favorable to the defendant. A defensive summary judgment motion is when the defendant says that the plaintiff cannot win, even when all facts are construed favorably for the plaintiff. It is important to note that when a party moves for SJ, the nonmoving party then bears the burden of showing that there is a genuine issue to be tried. If the nonmoving party cannot demonstrate the existence of a triable issue, then the motion for SJ should be granted, and the matter should be dismissed.
The motion for SJ is different from the motion for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. While the 12b6 motion states that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which there is a remedy at law, the movant in a SJ states that there is an actionable claim at law, but the facts particular to this case show that the movant cannot lose.
Finally, after the pleading stage, either party can bring a motion for a directed verdict, or judgment as a matter of law. A party properly moves for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence presented by the adversary. This motion says that given the case in chief of the adversary party, no reasonable finder of fact could find for the nonmoving party, and therefore as a matter of law, judgment is proper for the moving party. If this motion is denied, the movant can renew the motion at the close of all the evidence presented in the entire matter, under the name Renewed Motion for Directed Verdict.
The preceding has been a self serving exercise; I am trying to get these concepts together in my own head. If you read this and you are not studying for a bar exam, then you are a true friend, because you could not have given a care about any of this. Thank you.
